Newest first, grouped by year. Search or filter by topic.
Inflow's last commit landed on 23 July 2022 and nothing in the repository says so. The retrospective on eleven parts of reading a teaching repo as an artefact - what it gets right, what it costs, and what four passes over one estate add up to.
Inflow is full of deliberate, defensible simplifications. One of them is explained in a code comment, and it is instantly legible as a teaching decision. The other seven are indistinguishable, on the evidence in the repository, from bugs.
Inflow throws at startup if a module's local copy of another module's event has changed shape. The rule the whole repository exists to demonstrate - that no module may reference another - is protected by nothing at all.
Inflow's .NET 6 upgrade touches 519 files. Run the diff with whitespace ignored and almost all of it is one Rider refactoring - and the three real changes, plus two design rewrites nobody announced, are hiding underneath it.
Inflow ships the same exercise twice, on two branches prepared eleven days apart from the same commit. They do not start from the same place, neither converges on master, and both carry a README describing components they have deleted.
One branch in Inflow carries five commits timestamped 11:56, 13:49, 14:11, 14:49 and 16:08 on a single Saturday. That is not a development history - it is a live teaching session committed as it happened, and it explains a defect on master.
Four articles of defects earn an audit. Inflow's README makes fifteen checkable claims and eleven of them hold - including the strongest one, checked edge by edge across all twenty project files. Here is the ledger, and why a short README is so hard to falsify.
Inflow's request collection contains a captioned request that grants full administrative permissions to an anonymous caller. The mechanism is four lines long, the documented happy path requires it, and the repository nowhere says it is on purpose - here is all of that, and the case for the defence.
GET /payments returns a 404 in Inflow's own root request file. The reason is not a typo - it is the Payments module exercising exactly the architectural freedom the README advertises, which makes this 404 the best evidence in the repository that the claim is true.
Getting money into a wallet in Inflow takes five HTTP requests and nine in-process reactions nobody documents. Reconstructing that path from source is the only way to get it - and every failure along it returns 204 No Content.
Inflow ships an executable request collection - five .rest files, thirty-seven requests. On a fresh clone nine of them return a 2xx, and eight of those nine are in one file. This series reads the repository itself as the artefact.
Trill ships a PM2 ecosystem file, a Tye manifest and a Docker Compose file - three ways to start the estate that disagree about which services exist, plus a Prometheus config that scrapes a service two of them never launch.
The tick that makes eventual consistency watchable in a console, the four-hop chain that takes twenty seconds because of it, and the DI-scope trap the estate is one refactor away from firing.
There is no dotnet new template and no CLI — Convey's onboarding is docs, samples and source. Reading the repo-of-repos layout and its packing scripts, then walking the actual path: build your first service from an empty project, one config section at a time.
