Newest first, grouped by year. Search or filter by topic.
Line, branch and condition coverage each assert less than you think - mutation testing is the honesty check that reveals whether your suite would actually notice a bug, and the thresholds worth enforcing are conventions, not laws.
Engineering Craft carries 25 of the framework's 100 points and splits into nine sub-disciplines - why writing code earns only 18 of them, why architecture is the most leveraged skill in the model, and why reading code overtakes writing it by the time seniority arrives.
Inflow has nine tests, all in one module, and the most interesting one asserts a defect as if it were the specification. The honest retrospective on five modules, four architectures and what the estate actually teaches.
Trill's monolith routes every cross-module event through an unbounded channel drained by one background service - so its flagship end-to-end test has to sleep for two seconds to observe the architecture working.
An honest retrospective on Trill's five services and its client - twelve xunit scaffolds with no test files and no project references, a green test script over nothing, and a defect list where almost every entry would have died to a four-line assertion.
Conferences and Speakers disagree on layout, naming, id policy, exception visibility, mapping style and route constraints - plus a 200 that returns nothing and a broker that threw NotImplementedException for four months. The honest ledger.
Orders and Parcels keep the estate's only cross-service contract honest with Pactify - a pact written to a relative path six directories above the repository, verified against a seeded Huge Weapon, and checked for shape only. Consumer-driven contracts with no broker, read from source.
Nine Pacco repositories run dotnet test against zero test projects and stay vacuously green, while the one repo with a real unit-integration-e2e-performance pyramid is the only one whose Travis config omits the test step.
Nine DShop services ship a tests folder and only one of them tests anything - a census where five test projects cannot even see the code they claim to cover and the lone unit test asserts a thing that never happens. Part 14 of Nine Services and a Message Bus.
Twenty-two parts of source reading and not one about tests. How Convey's design choices land on your test suite: handlers that fake beautifully, an exposed host builder for integration tests, config flags as test infrastructure, and conventions that deserve a pin.
Pactify.AspNetCore in one sitting: an attribute, an assembly scan, and a /pacts/{provider} endpoint that serves your contract classes as live JSON - plus what a runtime contracts endpoint is really for.
The series retrospective - what a thirty-file library taught me that a full-featured one couldn't, Pactify's honest limit list versus PactNet, the broker maturity ladder, and the org-shaped question hiding under the tooling.
A line-by-line read of Pactify's matching engine - top-level-only body comparison, header names that ignore your casing option, nested objects that can never match, and two format-string bugs that crash the error path.
How a pact travels from the consumer's pipeline to the provider's - Pactify's file and HTTP publishers, Pact Broker URL anatomy, and the unchecked response status that makes a failed publish silently pass your build.
The provider side of Pactify - how CreateFor<Startup> hosts your whole API in memory with TestServer, why interactions verify concurrently, the SmartFormat trick behind endpoint templating, and the discovery that Given(...) never runs.
An annotated tour of the JSON document Pactify produces - the serializer settings that shape it, the snake_case field inherited from Pact v1, and the unusual decision to ship the consumer's matching options inside the contract itself.
A walk through Pactify's PactMaker fluent API - the two-interface builder trick that hides Build() from you, why the consumer test always passes, and the uninitialized-object surprise inside WithBody<T>().
Unit tests mock what you assume, end-to-end tests tell you too late - consumer-driven contract testing closes the gap, and a small open-source .NET library called Pactify is the clearest way I know to learn how it works. Part 1 of a series.
How do you assert that an endpoint published an event when publishing is a side effect with no return channel? FeedR's end-to-end test answers with WebApplicationFactory, a real Redis round-trip, and a TaskCompletionSource - plus the timeout and determinism traps the sample leaves open. Part 9 of the FeedR deep dive.
